Abc writing assessment rubric
Therefore, the students agreed to label the lowest level as "Fast Writing. Too funny, Jen!
Some features of an Excellent submission are present but at least some realistically achievable outcomes are included. Mostly represents topic adequately; some higher-order relationships shown. To build a digital rubric, project this Word document that already has the Smekens 6-Traits icons placed.
Basic proficiency: able to guide learners correctly through the facts of the material; basic understanding of the subject matter; ability to develop solutions to simple problems in the material; evidence of exposure to the literature; all stated outcomes are supported.
All tasks and exercises relate to the actual material. Concepts complete; well balanced between broad perspective and crucial detail.
Rubric for abc book project
Move to the middle column and label it "pretty good. Great Teacher Comments: Jen Caruso literacy coach at Hatfield Elementary in Mitchell, IN was conducting a mini-lesson model on how to build a rubric with second graders. Clear and compelling; cuts through superficial complexity but all essential relationships present; independently finds appropriate level of abstractions. Many features of an Excellent submission are present; all prerequisites are respected but the balance between synthetic and "real" data needs work. Repeat this process a third time, describing each trait at a "just starting" or low level. General Advances the field: strong evidence of original thinking while organizing the material in a lucid and rigorous manner; extends concepts of the subject matter without losing focus; covers current aspects as well as developing trends; discovers non-obvious relationships and extensions to other domains while keeping with the objectives of the unit; supports all outcomes in an effortlessly integrated fashion. Competence has not been achieved and is not imparted on the learner - any of: insufficient understanding of subject matter; factual errors; weakness in critical and analytic skills; limited or irrelevant use of literature; claims outcomes that are not supported by the material. Choppy; confusing; with erroneous application of principles. All tasks and exercises relate to the actual material. Mostly represents topic adequately; some higher-order relationships shown.
based on 46 review